Bite registration

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Introduction[edit]

The jaws of the face need to meet in a way that allows effective function but is not damaging to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).[1] This is equally important for those who are edentulous (have no teeth), those with few teeth or those with a full, healthy dentition.

Recording bite registration (also referred to as occlusal registration) allows 3-dimensional recognition of how the opposing jaws normally contact - dynamically and at-rest - in relation to one another. This is controlled by the TMJ, muscles aiding chewing and teeth (if applicable). The information gained can be transferred to a diagnostic study model (a stone cast of teeth), imperative when planning direct (fillings); indirect (crowns, dentures, bridges, mouthguards and orthodontics) and provisional restorations; implants; craniomaxillofacial surgeries; orthognathic surgeries or when a dentist plans to change the way in which a patient's teeth meet.[2]

Centric relation (CR) is a phenomenon integral to bite registration success. Although its definition is variable, it refers to a replicable clinical relationship between the upper and lower jaws that is unrelated to intercuspation, the way the teeth meet together when biting.[3] This is a useful reference point when considering jaw movements (vertical/lateral/protrusive), mounting casts in dental laboratories and overseeing oral rehabilitation. If centric relation is not considered, prostheses made could interfere with normal masticatory (chewing) function, causing instability, discomfort and sequelae like temporomandibular disease (TMD).

If a patient is edentulous, the centric relation should conform with the most superior, anterior temporomandibular condyle position, where the joint disc and adjacent bone contact without distortion.

A wax bite-block/occlusal rim will be used in those with inadequate tooth contact, allowing the jaws to meet when registering the bite.

Recording of a patient's bite registration has been common practice for over 400 years.[4] Generally, this is completed using a variety of impression materials and related tools, but with technological advancements, use of innovative intraoral scanners is on the rise. Although the outcome should be the same whatever the technique, it is important that errors are minimised to ensure an accurate reproduction of occlusal relationships.[5]

Dental technicians working in the laboratory require the information obtained from registering a patient's bite to fabricate indirect restorations. Using this, they can set-up an articulator - a "stand" capable of imitating jaw movements on which a model of the patient's jaws sits - and arrange teeth (if applicable) in the correct positions[6].

Bite registration aims for an accurately fitting final prosthesis where:

  • Teeth meet where they look/feel best.
  • Majority of the force is absorbed by the posterior teeth.
  • The tongue can contact the soft palate.
  • The patient can reliably reproduce the position.

Indications[edit]

The purpose of bite registration is to convey how the upper and lower jaw are vertically and horizontally positioned against each other when the patient bites together.[7][8] This information is important for any restorative work that may change or interfere with how the patient normally bites, such as dentures, crowns, and bridges.[9][8] An unchanged bite is usually preferred, and where change is preferred, it is necessary to control how the bite changes and by how much.[9] Once a patient’s bite has been registered, this information can then be used to mount dental models onto an articulator in a manner that resembles how the patient normally bites, a process known as ‘articulation'.[9]

The most accurate method of articulating tooth models is via “hand articulation”.[7][8] With this method, pairs of teeth (1 upper tooth and 1 lower tooth), from at least 3 different locations on the jaws, that contact each other when the patient bites together are identified and recorded, these teeth (known as index teeth) are then positioned together on the models to reproduce the bite.[9][8][7] This method is indicated where it is feasible.[7]

Where insufficient index teeth are present in a dentition for a stable hand articulation, a material (see ‘Materials’ section) is bit on by the patient, on which tooth imprints can then be used to articulate the models appropriately.  This method may be more commonly required for (but not limited to)[8].[7]

1. Multiple adjacent teeth requiring restoration, especially for fixed restorations;

2. Last standing molar in either side of an arch, as it may be the first tooth to make contact with the opposite jaw when the patient bites;

3. Restorative work involving the last tooth on an arch, as it would be the first tooth to make contact with the opposite jaw when the patient bites;

4. Tooth completely missing in the opposite jaw, such as in denture cases;

5. Multiple teeth located next to each other that do not contact the opposite jaw due to tooth wear;

6. Individual crowns

Recent advancements in CAD/CAM technology has also allowed teeth to be scanned and recreated as digital models, which may then be used to identify index teeth or even algorithmically recreate the patient’s bite to a similar accuracy as hand articulation, which may be useful for crown and bridgework.[10][11][12]

Materials[edit]

Bite registration can be achieved using a variety of materials including, zinc oxide-eugenol paste, thermoplastic wax, elastomers, impression plaster, acrylic resin, T-scan, pressure-sensitive films, transparent acetate sheet and occlusion sonography.[13]

The material used should not  change the position of the teeth but should accurately record the occlusal and incisal surfaces of the teeth. The ideal material has a low viscosity, low resistance to closure, easy manipulation, adequate working time, precision in detail, rapid hardening, and is dimensionally stable.[14]

High viscosity materials pose the risk of displacing teeth affected by periodontal issues, resulting in jaw misalignment and inaccurate jaw registration. The material chosen should allow for both passive and precise placement of dental casts.[14] Materials that are rigid or possess high surface reproducibility may hinder the easy seating of casts, often necessitating forceful articulation of the models.[14]

Thermoplastic waxes[edit]

Thermoplastic waxes are commonly utilised for bite registration, serving either as records themselves or as carriers for registration. These waxes are versatile and widely embraced material largely due to its affordability and ease of handling.[15]

Advantages:

  • Versatile use
  • Affordable
  • Ease of handling

Disadvantages:

  • Poor dimensional stability

Zinc oxide-eugenol paste[edit]

Zinc oxide-eugenol paste serves as a reliable and efficient material for bite registration. Therefore, it is recommended to use minimal amounts of zinc oxide-eugenol to prevent excessive flash, which can impede the precise seating of casts.[7]

Advantages;

  • Rigid[7]
  • Ease of application[7]
  • dimensional stability[7]
  • good flow[7]

Disadvantages:

Impression Plaster[edit]

Impression plaster is a historic material which can be used for bite registration. Its primary component is calcined calcium sulfate hemihydrate, which, upon mixing with water, reacts to form a rigid mass of calcium sulfate dihydrate.[17] Plaster of Paris is a plaster material used for casting impressions, impression plaster for bite registration consists of plaster of Paris with additives, more water can be added to the powder than with the casting material to provide more flow for taking the impression. These additives hasten the setting time and reduce setting expansion.[17]

Advantages:[17]

  • Good flow
  • Accurate
  • Dimensional stability

Disadvantages:[17]

  • Prone to fracture, especially where undercuts are present, due to thin layer required for bite registration
  • Untidy
  • Difficult handling properties
  • Brittle

Alginate[edit]

Alginate is an elastic irreversible hydrocolloid and one of the most common impression materials. It has a mixing time of 45-60 seconds and is fast setting.[18]

Advantages:[18]

  • good surface detail
  • Elastic - useful for small undercuts
  • Low wetting angle
  • Cheap
  • Fast setting

Disadvantages:[18]

  • Poor tear strength - poor for deep undercuts
  • Alginate should not be used for bite registration against a Polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression as poor articulation will result from the lack of surface detail. For a PVS impression, bite registration should be taken with a PVS material or an alginate substitute.

Elastomers[edit]

Elastomers were introduced to overcome the disadvantages of acrylic resins. There are two varieties of silicone elastomers used for bite registration: condensation silicone and addition silicone. Polyester Elastomeric compounds, condensation elastomers,  are made from polyether terminated with amino groups cross linked with strong acids.[14]

Advantages:

  • High dimensional accuracy[15]
  • Good elastic recovery after deformation[15]
  • Hydrophilic[15]
  • Easy to manipulate[14]
  • Low resistance to closure[14]
  • Easy to trim with no distortion[14]

Disadvantages:[15]

  • low to moderate tear strength
  • Short working and setting time
  • High stiffness
  • Cannot be immersed in disinfecting solutions for longer than 10 minutes due to hydrophilic nature

Acrylic resins[edit]

Acrylic resins were introduced as a bite registration material in 1961 to overcome the disadvantages of other bite registration materials.[14] Acrylic resin is an accurate and rigid material post setting, however the material contracts on setting, therefore is not dimensionally stable.[14] Once cured, the material can also damage the stone model due to its rigidity, therefore are not in current use.[14]

Silicones[edit]

Silicones are synthetic compounds composed of silicone and oxygen linked together to form a 16 siloxane chain.[19] Elastomeric materials are beneficial when recording the intermaxillary relationship for an unstable occlusion, however are not the first materials of choice for bite registration.[13] Polyvinyl siloxane is an addition silicone which is chemically similar to impression silicones with modifications to the flexibility.[19]

Polyvinyl siloxane advantages:

  • dimensionally stable[20]
  • able to be immersed in disinfecting solution[20]
  • Accurate[19]
  • Easy to handle[20]

Disadvantages:

  • Shrinkage on curing[20]
  • Short working time[20]

Technique[edit]

Occlusal wax rims (wax record blocks)[edit]

This technique is used when the edentulous area is large or when opposing teeth do not meet. Occlusal rims can be mounted on record bases, made from various materials like Shellac or resin.[21]

Wax occlusal rims should be reduced in height until the opposing teeth are not touching the rims.[21] Jaw relation record is made in a uniformly soft material which sets to a hard state such as quick-setting impression plaster, bite registration paste silicone. In this instance record blocks act as carriers for a more accurate registration medium (e.g. silicone).

Another method involves the use of wax rims as a recording medium, as opposed to a carrier. In this instance, the indent of opposing teeth is recorded directly in the wax without using any other registration medium.[21]

When no occlusal contact exists between the remaining natural teeth, jaw relation records are made entirely on occlusion rims. The same method is used for complete dentures and the use of a face bow is implemented.[21]

Digital cad cam technique[edit]

A range of intraoral scanners are available to allow data acquisition of the dental arches or tooth preparation(s), which is coupled to software for designing the virtual restoration(s) and a computerised milling device to construct the definitive restoration. Following scanning of the dental arch or area of specific interest to obtain an optical impression, an instant interocclusal record can be obtained by taking a buccal scan of the teeth in the intercuspal position, as in the case with the iTero® and Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner systems. Another system involves placing registration material over the prepared tooth only, and a scan is taken to determine the occlusal relationship.[22][23]

Application[edit]

Bite registration is used in several dental treatments.

These include:[24][25]

  • Wide range of prosthetic restorations
    • Resin inlays/ onlays
    • Zirconia copings
    • Single crowns in lithium disilicate, zirconia, metal-ceramic and all ceramic
    • Bridges
    • Frameworks
    • Partial and full dentures
  • Implants
  • Orthodontic diagnosis and treatment plan
    • Occlusal analysis
  • Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder
    • Diagnosing and planning treatment
    • Fabricating splints

References[edit]

  1. ^ Camci, Hasan (2021). "A new technique for testing accuracy and sensitivity of digital bite registration: A prospective comparative study". International Orthodontics. 3 (19): 425–432. doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2021.06.008. PMID 34274289 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  2. ^ Small, bruce (2006). "Centric relation bite registration". General Dental Journal. 51 (1): 10–11. PMID 16494112 – via PubMed.
  3. ^ Wiens, Jonathan P.; Goldstein, Gary R.; Andrawis, Mark; Choi, Mijin; Priebe, Jennifer W. (2018-03-08). "Defining centric relation". The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 120 (1): 114–122. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.008.
  4. ^ Fang, Yiqin; Fang, Jing-Huan; Jeong, Seung-Mi; Choi, Byung-Ho (2018-03-09). "A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch". Journal of Prosthodontics. 28 (2): e519–e523. doi:10.1111/jopr.12786. ISSN 1059-941X. PMID 29522269.
  5. ^ Park, Jaeyoon; You, Insang; Shin, Sangbaie; Jeong, Unyong (2015-04-27). "Material Approaches to Stretchable Strain Sensors". ChemPhysChem. 16 (6): 1155–1163. doi:10.1002/cphc.201402810. ISSN 1439-4235. PMID 25641620.
  6. ^ Savastano, Fabio (2023), "Freeway Space (FWS) in Neuromuscular Dentistry", Neuromuscular Orthodontics, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–14, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41295-0_1, ISBN 978-3-031-41294-3, retrieved 2024-05-07
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Thanabalan, Naren; Amin, Kiran; Butt, Kasim; Bourne, George (2019-09-01). "Interocclusal Records in Fixed Prosthodontics". Primary Dental Journal. 8 (3): 40–47. doi:10.1308/205016819827601473. ISSN 2050-1684. PMID 31666172.
  8. ^ a b c d e Raju, Dr. Soja; Nair, Dr. Vivek V; K, Dr. Harshakumar; Ravichandran, Dr. R (2020-10-01). "Interocclusal recording materials and techniques: A literature review". International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences. 6 (4): 397–400. doi:10.22271/oral.2020.v6.i4f.1095.
  9. ^ a b c d Klineberg, Iven; Eckert, Steven E., eds. (2016). Functional occlusion in restorative dentistry and prosthodontics. St. Louis Edinburgh New York: Elsevier/Mosby. ISBN 978-0-7234-3809-0.
  10. ^ Moore, Blake K; Deane, Stuart; Huang, Weber; Kim, James; Parthasarathi, Krishnan (2021-07-23). "Occlusal comparison of hand-articulation versus digital articulation in orthognathic surgery". British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 60 (4): 443–447. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.013. PMID 35331564.
  11. ^ Yau, Hong-Tzong; Liao, Shu-Wei; Chang, Chia-Hao (2020-07-09). "Modeling of digital dental articulator and its accuracy verification using optical measurement". Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 196: 105646. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105646. PMID 32682091.
  12. ^ Abdulateef, Saraa; Edher, Faraj; Hannam, Alan G.; Tobias, David L.; Wyatt, Chris C.L. (2020-01-31). "Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records". The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 124 (6): 667–673. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.014. PMID 32014284.
  13. ^ a b Deepthi, B (2018). "Recent interocclusal record material for prosthetic rehabilitation - A literature review". Drug Invention Today. 10: 2004–2009 – via ResearchGate.
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Shetty, Ganaraj; Shetty, Manoj (2020-04-12). "A Review of Occlusal Registration Materials Utilized in Recording Various Occlusal Relations". Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU. 08 (3): 025–028. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1708759. ISSN 2582-4287.
  15. ^ a b c d e Gupta, Ranjan (2023-03-19). Dental Impression Materials. StatPearls.
  16. ^ a b Carr, Alan (2015-11-03). McCracken's Removable Partial Prosthodontics (13th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9780323339919.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  17. ^ a b c d Bonsor, Stephen (2013). A clinical guide to applied dental materials. Churchill Livingston. ISBN 9780702031588.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  18. ^ a b c Nandini, VVidyashree; Venkatesh, KVijay; Nair, KChandrasekharan (2008). "Alginate impressions: A practical perspective". Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 11 (1): 37. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.43416. ISSN 0972-0707. PMC 2813082. PMID 20142882.
  19. ^ a b c Craig, R.G. (1988-08-01). "Review of Dental Impression Materials". Advances in Dental Research. 2 (1): 51–64. doi:10.1177/08959374880020012001. hdl:2027.42/66604. ISSN 0895-9374. PMID 3073785.
  20. ^ a b c d e Chee, Winston W.L.; Donovan, Terry E. (November 1992). "Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: A review of properties and techniques". The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 68 (5): 728–732. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90192-D. PMID 1432791.
  21. ^ a b c d Klineberg, Iven; Eckert, Steven E., eds. (2016). Functional occlusion in restorative dentistry and prosthodontics. St. Louis Edinburgh New York: Elsevier/Mosby. ISBN 978-0-7234-3809-0.
  22. ^ Field, James; Storey, Claire (2020). Removable prosthodontics at a glance. Hoboken, NJ: WILEY Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-119-51069-7.
  23. ^ Sonawane, Aditya; Sathe, Seema (2020). "Interocclusal records: A review". Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. 15 (4): 709. doi:10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_184_20. ISSN 0974-3901.
  24. ^ Kakali, Lydia; Halazonetis, Demetrios J. (2023-07-25). "A novel method for testing accuracy of bite registration using intraoral scanners". Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 53 (4): 254–263. doi:10.4041/kjod22.199. ISSN 2234-7518. PMC 10387426. PMID 37497582.
  25. ^ Mangano, Francesco; Gandolfi, Andrea; Luongo, Giuseppe; Logozzo, Silvia (2017-12-12). "Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature". BMC Oral Health. 17 (1). doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x. ISSN 1472-6831. PMC 5727697. PMID 29233132.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bite_registration&oldid=1222993966"