Hext v Yeomans

Hext v Yeomans (1583) ^[1] is an early defamation case wherein the Court found that slander do not lie upon inferences.^[2]^[3] It was the origin of the mitior sensus doctrine, imputing a mere intention to commit a crime was held to be nonactionable.

The defendant referred to as Yeoman was accused of saying to Hext I doubt not but to see thee hanged for stricking Mr Sydmans man, who was murdered. The judge found that Yeoman had not actually asserted it was Hext who had done the murder, merely that he had struck him.

References[edit]

^ Hext v Yeomans Michalmas 11 Jac 4 Co15b
^ David Hoffman, A Course of Legal Study: Respectfully Addressed to the Students of Law in the United States (W.S. Hein, 1817) p161.
^ William Nelson, An Abridgment of the Common Law (R. Gosling, W. Mears, 1726) p103.

This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[1] Hext v Yeomans Michalmas 11 Jac 4 Co15b

[2] David Hoffman, A Course of Legal Study: Respectfully Addressed to the Students of Law in the United States (W.S. Hein, 1817) p161.

[3] William Nelson, An Abridgment of the Common Law (R. Gosling, W. Mears, 1726) p103.

[1]

[2]

[3]