64 Woodlawn Avenue West
 | This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (May 2024) |
| 64 Woodlawn Avenue West (formerly Caldecott House) | |
|---|---|
| General information | |
| Architectural style | Period Revival style influenced by the Arts and Crafts Movement |
| Address | 64 Woodlawn Avenue West |
| Year(s) built | 1906 |
| Owner | Stapleton Caldecott |
| Technical details | |
| Material | brick cladding, brick, stone and wood detailing, wood strapwork in the gables |
| Size | 9000 square feet |
| Floor count | 2½-stories |
| Design and construction | |
| Architect(s) | Eden Smith |
| Official name | Caldecott House (as originally designated) |
| Designated | 2018 |
The property located at 64 Woodlawn Avenue West in Toronto, (formerly known as the Caldecott House) is a heritage residence, located in the St. Paul's (Ward 22) area of the city. The 2+1⁄2-storey detached house was designated under the Ontario Heritage Act in 2018, deemed notable for its design by noted architect Eden Smith.
Heritage details[edit]
Per the official designation, the building “is valued for its design as a fine representative example of an early 20th century house form building designed in the Period Revival style influenced by the Arts and Crafts Movement as interpreted by architect Eden Smith. It is distinguished by its asymmetrical plan with the projecting bays, the complicated roofline with the gables and the distinctive canted chimneys, and the decorative wood strapwork.” [1] The house was commissioned by Robert Stapleton Pitt Caldecott in 1906. Caldecott served as president of the Toronto Board of Trade and was a “highly regarded businessman” and his information was included in the nomination for the heritage designation.[2]
Controversy[edit]
In 2024, the current owners of the residence applied to the Toronto Preservation Board to have the historic designation removed from the residence; the owners state that Caldecott “held restrictive views on immigration and advocated for assimilation to protect the character of Canada under the Empire”, which they could not agree with. The current owners also want the designation removed as they feel Caldecott would not approve of them inhabiting the house he commissioned.[2] The Preservation Board rejected their request to have the designation removed, saying the residence is also notable for its unique architectural qualities. The Board did agree to remove all mentions of Caldecott from the designation documents, given his views on immigration. The owners had sought to make alterations to certain elements on the property that are protected under the heritage designation; when they were told they would need to get permission from the city before make any significant changes, the owners stated they were not aware of the heritage designation on their home. When their request to have the historic designation removed was declined, their lawyer explained that they might seek judgement from the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal if necessary.[3]
References[edit]
- ^ City of Toronto (May 24, 2018). NOTICE OF PASSING OF BY-LAW 606-2018 (Technical report) – via Ontario Heritage Trust.
- ^ a b Smith, Noah (April 21, 2024). "Toronto Home's Heritage Status Contested Due to Racist Origins of Original Owner". Trendy Digests. Retrieved May 21, 2024 – via msn.com.
- ^ Smee, Michael (April 5, 2024). "Couple fights to rid Toronto home of heritage status". CBC News. Retrieved May 21, 2024.