Prabhavathi Meppayil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prabhavathi Meppayil
Born
Bangalore
NationalityIndian
Alma materKen School of Art
Notable workn/eighty two (2016)
MovementMinimalism

Prabhavathi Meppayil (born 1965) is an Indian abstract artist known for her modernist and minimalist paintings, and installation art.

Biography[edit]

Prabhavati Meppayil was born in Bangalore.[1][2] She belongs to a family of goldsmiths, her father and brother being craftsmen of handmade jewellery.[3]

After obtaining a BA from Bangalore University in 1986, she studied for a diploma in Fine Art at the Ken School of Art.[4]

Meppayil established her studio on Avenue Road in Bangalore, an area with a concentration of goldsmiths.[5]

Technique[edit]

Meppayil's works involve the use of traditional material and artisanal technique. She works with gesso, and copper, gold and iron wires. Her studio involves master metalworkers who stretch the metals that she then embeds into the gesso panels. She lays the gesso in multiple layers over wooden panels and polishes them. The interplay between the metal and the gesso has not entirely predictable results, the surface colours themselves aging over time.[2] In some works, she has used the traditional thinnam, jewellers' steel tools, to create microscopic indents, both horizontal and vertical, across the gesso.[6]

Critical reception[edit]

Benjamin H. D. Buchloh's analysis of Meppayil's work regards its formal nature and suggests that the use of white was so that it could become a space for writing, or get assimilated as architecture. Meppayil agrees that the interstitial spaces are important to her.[2] He has also described it as a collision of ordering principles and disordering strategies, as it expands on the Modernist theme of anti-narration.[7] He hoped that there would be a nuanced appreciation for the work, recognising the historical specificity of her artistic approach.[6]

In Shanay Jhaveri's view, the use of a reduced colour palette and visual considerations of the grid is a dialogue between Western Modernism of the 1950s and 1960s and contemporary South Asian art, expressing the clashing aesthetics of Indian neoliberalism versus the progressive ideals of Modernism.[6]

Other reviewers have likened Meppayil's abstractions to those of Conceptual Minimalism and to the Italian Pittura Segnica, evoking among others Gastone Novelli.[8]

Exhibitions[edit]

Meppayil's art was displayed at the 55th Venice Biennale in 2013, the Pace Gallery in London in 2014, and at the Art Basel Unlimited in 2016. It has been presented at the 2016–2017 Kochi-Muziris Biennale.[2] In 2016, her work was exhibited at the Dhaka Art Summit.[9]

One of her works "fourteen/sixteen" was sold for $20,000 at the Frieze Art Fair in London in 2016.[10]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Pedro, Laila (6 December 2016). "Prabhavati Meppayil: In Conversation with Laila Pedro". The Brooklyn Rail. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
  2. ^ a b c d Khurana, Chanpreet (3 February 2017). "In this Indian artist's stunning works, chance plays a powerful role". Scroll. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  3. ^ Jayaram, Suresh (26 December 2016). "What You See When You See: Prabhavati M: Minimal Poetry Between Memory and Loss". Bangalore Mirror. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
  4. ^ "Prabhavathi Meppayil: Biographical Documents". Pace Gallery. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
  5. ^ Thomas, Skye Arundhati (26 March 2017). "Prabhavathi Meppayil". Studio International. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
  6. ^ a b c Jhaveri, Shanay (16 September 2014). "Prabhavati Meppayil". Frieze. Retrieved 16 September 2017.
  7. ^ "Prabhavati Meppayil tw/one, 2016". Art Basel. Retrieved 16 September 2017.
  8. ^ Taiuti, Lorenzo (27 April 2014). "Minimalismo dall'India. Prabhavathi Meppayil all'Accademia Americana a Roma". Retrieved 16 September 2017.
  9. ^ Tasneem, Shuprova (5 February 2016). "Behind the scenes of Dhaka Art Summit 2016". Dhaka Tribune. Retrieved 16 September 2017.
  10. ^ Pogrebin, Robin (6 October 2016). "At Frieze Art Fairs, No Frenzy but a Sense of Steady Activity". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 September 2017.

External links[edit]