Image fidelity
Image fidelity, often referred to as the ability to discriminate between two images[1] or how closely the image represents the real source distribution.[2] Different from image quality, which is often referred to as the subject preference for one image over another, image fidelity represents to the ability of a process to render an image accurately, without any visible distortion or information loss. The two terms are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same.[3]
If we cannot detect the difference between a photograph and a digitally printed image, we might conclude that the digital print has photographic image quality.[4] But subjective impressions of image quality are much more difficult to characterize and, consequently, nearly impossible to quantify. It is not difficult to demonstrate that people use multiple visual factors or dimensions in complex non-linear combinations to make judgements about image quality.[5] There are also significant individual differences in their judgements.[6]
Image fidelity in photography[edit]
In photography, image fidelity is also referred to as micro-contrast or 3D pop. The inner tonal rendition of an image could be found as more shades and details are rendered.
There are three ways to increase image fidelity.[7]
The first is to adopt a high transmission lens on the camera. Lenses with high transmissive characteristics can direct more light into the sensors.
The second is to increase the sensor saturation. There are two ways do this:
- Reduce the thickness of the filter array on the camera sensor so that more low-gain light can be recorded
- Increase the light on the subject so that the sensors are more saturated.
The latter is more common. Flash is usually the method used to achieve it.
Third, reducing or removing the color filter array on a camera sensor. To remove or reduce the thickness of the filter array on the camera sensor so that more low-gain light can be recorded.[8] This process is also called "Debayering a sensor".[9]
References[edit]
- ^ Silverstein, D. A.; Farrell, J. E. (September 1996). "The relationship between image fidelity and image quality". Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Vol. 1. pp. 881–884 vol.1. doi:10.1109/ICIP.1996.559640. ISBN 0-7803-3259-8. S2CID 17711937.
- ^ Wright, M. (2000). "2000ASPC..217..344W Page 344". Imaging at Radio Through Submillimeter Wavelengths. 217: 344. Bibcode:2000ASPC..217..344W. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
- ^ Silverstein, D. A.; Farrell, J. E. (September 1996). "The relationship between image fidelity and image quality". Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Vol. 1. pp. 881–884 vol.1. doi:10.1109/ICIP.1996.559640. ISBN 0-7803-3259-8. S2CID 17711937.
- ^ Silverstein, D. A.; Farrell, J. E. (September 1996). "The relationship between image fidelity and image quality". Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Vol. 1. pp. 881–884 vol.1. doi:10.1109/ICIP.1996.559640. ISBN 0-7803-3259-8. S2CID 17711937.
- ^ "IMAGE QUALITY: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL PROBLEM" (PDF). NASA.
- ^ Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press. 1972. pp. 105–156. ISBN 978-0127857817.
- ^ "The FACTS of IMAGE FIDELITY & its existence". Youtube.
- ^ Design, Wild Dog (2017-09-22). ""Monochroming" a colour sensor and colour photography with the Monochrom - Wild Dog Design". Retrieved 2020-12-03.
- ^ Design, Wild Dog (2017-09-22). ""Monochroming" a colour sensor and colour photography with the Monochrom - Wild Dog Design". Retrieved 2020-12-03.
Further reading[edit]
- Yannick Khong, Micro-Contrast, the biggest optical luxury of the world https://yannickkhong.com/blog/2016/2/8/micro-contrast-the-biggest-optical-luxury-of-the-world
- Zhou Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh and E. P. Simoncelli, "Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity," in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, April 2004, doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.